The Neurodiversity Design Standard
Seven domains. 35 criteria. 140 maximum points. The full assessment framework for neurodiversity-inclusive digital design.
How the standard works
Each criterion is scored from 0 (not met) to 4 (exemplary). Every score is supported with specific evidence from the assessment. The total possible score is 140 points.
Reviewed: Any score. Full report provided. 12-month validity.
Endorsed: 50%+ overall (70+ points), no domain below 1.5 average. 18-month validity.
Certified: 75%+ overall (105+ points), no domain below 2.5 average, review by an independent panel of neurodivergent professionals. 12-month validity with annual renewal.
All 7 domains and 35 criteria
How we test
Every NDC assessment combines lived experience with professional-grade technical testing. Our assessors are neurodivergent, and they are also technically skilled practitioners who test with the same tools and methods used in formal accessibility audits.
Assistive technologies
Assessments include testing with NVDA, JAWS, VoiceOver (iOS/macOS), TalkBack (Android), and ZoomText. We test how products behave when used with the assistive technologies neurodivergent people actually rely on.
Evaluation tools
Automated checks are run using axe DevTools, WAVE, and Siteimprove. Colour Contrast Analyser (CCA) is used for visual checks. PDF documents are tested with PAC (PDF Accessibility Checker) and Adobe Acrobat Pro.
Manual testing
Keyboard-only navigation is tested as standard on every assessment. We verify that all functionality is accessible without a mouse. We also test at multiple zoom levels (up to 400%) and with prefers-reduced-motion enabled.
Mobile accessibility
Products with mobile apps or responsive web interfaces are tested on iOS and Android with VoiceOver and TalkBack enabled. Touch target sizes, gesture alternatives, and mobile-specific navigation patterns are assessed.
WCAG criteria our testing covers
Our manual and automated testing covers the following WCAG 2.2 AA success criteria as part of every NDC assessment:
Keyboard (2.1.1, 2.1.2, 2.4.3, 2.4.7, 3.2.1)
Zoom and reflow (1.4.4, 1.4.10)
Colour and contrast (1.4.3, 1.4.11)
Text alternatives (1.1.1)
Audio and video (1.2.1, 1.2.2, 1.2.5)
Motion (2.2.2, 2.3.1)
Forms (1.3.1, 3.3.1, 3.3.2)
Headings and structure (1.3.1, 2.4.6)
In addition to WCAG, the NDC standard tests for cognitive load, executive function support, sensory overload prevention, emotional safety, dark pattern absence, notification respect, and personalisation. These are the areas WCAG does not reach.
D1 Cognitive Load and Information Architecture +
How much mental effort the product demands and how well information is organised.
D2 Reading and Language Accessibility +
Whether content is legible and understandable for users with dyslexia, ADHD, or processing differences.
D3 Sensory Design +
How the product handles visual, auditory, and motion elements for sensory-sensitive users.
D4 Predictability and Consistency +
Whether the product behaves reliably and builds user confidence through consistent patterns.
D5 Executive Function Support +
How well the product supports planning, sequencing, and task completion for users with executive function differences.
D6 Emotional Safety and Trust +
Whether the product respects user wellbeing, avoids manipulation, and builds genuine trust.
D7 Flexibility and Personalisation +
Whether users can adapt the product to their own needs and assistive technology requirements.
Co-existing conditions and digital design
Neurodivergent conditions rarely travel alone. ADHD, autism, dyslexia, and dyspraxia frequently co-occur with each other and with a range of other conditions that affect how people process information, perceive sensory input, and interact with digital products. Our assessors are trained to understand this broader picture, and the NDC standard is designed to catch the design failures these conditions create.
A note on co-occurring mental health conditions: anxiety, depression, PTSD, autistic burnout, and ADHD burnout are extremely common alongside neurodivergent conditions. While the NDC does not assess for mental health outcomes directly, our D6 (Emotional Safety and Trust) domain specifically evaluates whether digital products contribute to or reduce psychological distress. Products that use manipulative design, create artificial urgency, or punish users for errors can worsen existing mental health conditions. Our assessments are designed to catch these patterns.
How NDC relates to existing standards
The NDC standard does not replace any existing accessibility framework. It fills a specific gap that none of them currently cover: structured, scorable assessment of digital products for neurodivergent users. Here is how it sits alongside the standards that already exist.
In summary: the NDC standard draws on established research and guidance including WCAG 2.2, the W3C COGA guidance, and participatory design principles. It translates this evidence into a structured, scorable assessment framework specifically for neurodivergent users. It does not compete with any existing standard. It fills the gap between them.